Feasibility and outcomes of living-donor liver transplantation utilizing the right hemi-liver graft with portal vein anatomical variations.

PURPOSE: Portal vein (PV) reconstruction is a key factor for successful living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Anatomical variations of right PV (RPV) are encountered among potential donors. METHODS: To evaluate a single center experience of reconstruction techniques for the right hemi-liver grafts with PV variations during the period between May 2004 and 2022. RESULTS: A total of 915 recipients underwent LDLT, among them 52 (5.8%) had RPV anatomical variations. Type II PV was found in 7 cases (13.5%), which were reconstructed by direct venoplasty. Type III PV was found in 27 cases (51.9%). They were reconstructed by direct venoplasty in 2 cases (3.8%), Y graft interposition in 2 cases (3.8%), and in situ double PV anastomoses in 23 cases (44.2%). Type IV PV was found in 18 cases (34.6%) and was reconstructed by Y graft interposition in 9 cases (17.3%), and in situ double PV anastomoses in 9 cases (17.3%). Early right posterior PV stenosis occurred in 2 recipients (3.8%). Early PV thrombosis occurred in 3 recipients (5.8%). The median follow-up duration was 54.5 months (4 - 185). The 1-, 3-, and 5-years survival rates were 91.9%, 86%, and 81.2%, respectively. Late PV stenosis occurred in 2 recipients (3.8%) and was managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: Utilization of potential living donors with RPV anatomic variations may help to expand the donor pool. We found that direct venoplasty and in situ dual PV anastomoses techniques were safe, feasible, and associated with successful outcomes.

Predictive factors of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis for biliary complications in living-donor liver transplantation recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has shown great safety and efficacy in the management of post-living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) biliary complications. Pancreatitis is the most commonest and the most feared complication after ERCP. METHODS: We reviewed the data of liver transplant recipients who underwent ERCP for biliary complications after LDLT between 2011 and 2022. RESULTS: In total 63 patients underwent ERCP after LDLT. They were targeted to 134 set of ERCP. Pancreatitis occurred in 52 sets (38.8%). We subclassified the patients into two groups, without pancreatitis: 31 patients (49.2%) and with pancreatitis 32 patients (50.8%). A higher incidence of pancreatitis was noticed with the first ERCP set (P = 0.04). Biliary strictures were more noted in the pancreatitis group (P = 0.025). Difficult cannulation requiring precut was more observed in the pancreatitis group (P = 0.007). Also, more frequent sphincterotomy was observed in the pancreatitis group (P = 0.003). Longer hospital stay, more fever, abdominal pain and vomiting were noted in the pancreatitis group (P = 0.001). Higher post-ERCP serum amylase (P = 0.001) and creatinine (P = 0.021), while lower serum calcium (P = 0.21) were noticed in the pancreatitis group. On multivariate analysis, preoperative diabetes, number of biliary anastomoses (single/multiple) and difficult cannulation requiring precut were significant predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: Patient-related risk factors and bedside procedure-related risk factors play an essential role in the development of pancreatitis after ERCP for LDLT recipients. Endoscopists should be mindful by those high-risk patients during ERCP to apply appropriate techniques to prevent the development of this serious complication.

Long-term follow-up of living liver donors: A single-center experience.

Living donors are healthy individuals who are exposed to a major surgical procedure during which a major part of their liver is resected. Data on the long-term consequences of living liver donation are scarce. This study examined clinical, laboratory, and long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in 237 living liver donors and 239 matched controls during 48-168 months of postdonation follow-up. We used the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), version 1. The scores for the four following subscales were higher in nondonors than in donors: physical functioning (p = 0.009), role limitations due to physical health (p = 0.002), energy/fatigue (p < 0.001), and bodily pain (p < 0.001). The scores on the eight subscales of the SF-36 were higher in donors with living recipients than in donors whose recipients died (p < 0.001). Our results suggest that living donor right hepatectomy is safe and results in a postdonation HRQoL similar to that of nondonors in those donors whose recipients are healthy, whereas donors whose recipients die have a lower HRQoL that is significantly negatively correlated with the time since recipient death and improves over time.

Predictive Factors of De Novo Malignancies After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: De novo malignancies are a major reason of long-term mortalities after liver transplantation. However, they usually receive minimal attention from most health care specialists. The current study aims to evaluate our experience of de novo malignancies after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: We reviewed the data of patients who underwent LDLT at our center during the period between May 2004 and December 2018. RESULTS: During the study period, 640 patients underwent LDLT. After a mean follow-up period of 41.2 ± 25.8 months, 15 patients (2.3%) with de novo malignancies were diagnosed. The most common de novo malignancies were cutaneous cancers (40%), post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (13.3%), colon cancers (13.3%), and breast cancers (13.3%). Acute cellular rejection (ACR) episodes occurred in 10 patients (66.7%). Mild ACR occurred in 8 patients (53.3%), and moderate ACR occurred in 2 patients (13.3%). All patients were managed with aggressive cancer treatment. The mean survival after therapy was 40.8 ± 26.4 months. The mean overall survival after LDLT was 83.9 ± 52.9 months. Twelve patients (80%) were still alive, and 3 mortalities (20%) occurred. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates after LDLT were 91.7%, 91.7%, and 61.1%, respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, smoking history, operation time, and development of ACR episodes were significant predictors of de novo malignancy development. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant recipients are at high risk for the development of de novo malignancies. Early detection and aggressive management strategies are essential to improving the recipients' survival.

Renal Dysfunction after Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Experience with 500 Cases.

Introduction. The possible risk factors for chronic kidney disease in transplant recipients have not been thoroughly investigated after living-donor liver transplantation. Material and Methods. A retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults who underwent living-donor liver transplantation between May 2004 and October 2016, in a single center, was conducted. Kidney function was investigated successively for all the patients throughout the study period, with 12 months being the shortest follow-up. Postoperative renal dysfunction was defined in accordance with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration criteria. The patients' demographic data, preoperative and intraoperative parameters, and outcomes were recorded. A calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimen, either tacrolimus or cyclosporine, was used in all the patients. Results. Of the 413 patients included in the study, 33 (8%) who survived for ≥1 year experienced chronic kidney disease 1 year after living-donor liver transplantation. Twenty-seven variables were studied to compare between the patients with normal kidney functions and those who developed chronic kidney disease 1 year after living-donor liver transplantation. Univariate regression analysis for predicting the likelihood of chronic kidney disease at 1 year revealed that the following 4 variables were significant: operative time, P < 0.0005; intraoperative blood loss, P < 0.0005; preoperative renal impairment, P = 0.001; and graft-to-recipient weight ratio (as a negative predictor), P < 0.0005. In the multivariate regression analysis, only 2 variables remained as independent predictors of chronic kidney disease at 1 year, namely, operative time with a cutoff value of ≥714 minutes and graft-to-recipient weight ratio as a negative predictor with a cutoff value of <0.91. Conclusion. In this study, prolonged operative time and small graft-to-recipient weight ratio were independent predictors of chronic kidney disease at 1 year after living-donor liver transplantation.

Predictors of hepatitis C virus recurrence after living donor liver transplantation: Mansoura experience.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis is the leading cause of liver transplantation (LT). All patients who undergo LT with detectable serum HCV-RNA experience graft reinfection, which is the most frequent cause of graft loss and death in these patients. We estimated the rate of HCV recurrence and evaluated the current therapeutic regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of consecutive 325 living donor LT (LDLT) surgeries performed between May 2004 and August 2014 were retrospectively analysed; 207 of them were followed-up throughout the study. Clinical, laboratory, radiological and histopathological examinations were performed thoroughly. Patients received treatment in the form of either pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) or sofosbuvir, both in combination with ribavirin. RESULTS: In total, 90.3% of recipients who were transplanted because of HCV-related end-stage liver disease experienced recurrence due to the virus. The donor age was older in the HCV recurrent group versus the non-recurrence group (28.7±7.1 versus 22.6±2.6years: p≤0.001), warm ischaemia time was prolonged (46.1±18.1 versus 28.6±4.1min: p≤0.001), median cold ischaemia time was 40.0 (10-175) versus 22.5 (15-38) min (p≤0.001) and basal PCR was 414000 (546-116000000) versus 10766 (1230-40000) (p≤0.001). Sustained virological response was achieved in 95.4% of patients treated with a combination of a fixed daily dose of 400mg sofosbuvir with ribavirin and in 65.1% of those who were treated with PEG-IFN with ribavirin. CONCLUSIONS: Older donor age and prolonged warm ischaemia time are independent predictors of HCV recurrence after LDLT, and early treatment with the direct-acting sofosbuvir is helpful in resolving the problem of post-LT HCV recurrence.

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patients with liver cirrhosis present an increased susceptibility to the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), which is considered the cause of hospital admission in about 10% of patients and is present in about 40% of those admitted for ongoing complications. We tried to assess the prevalence of the SIRS with the possible effects on the course of the disease during hospital stay. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and three patients with liver cirrhosis were examined and investigated with close monitoring during hospital stay. The main clinical endpoints were death and the development of portal hypertension-related complications. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients met the criteria of SIRS (39.9%). We found significant correlations between SIRS and jaundice (p=0.005), bacterial infection (p=0.008), white blood cell count (p<0.001), low haemoglobin concentration (p=0.004), high serum creatinine levels (p<0.001), high alanine aminotransferase levels (p<0.001), serum bilirubin levels (p<0.001), international normalised ratio (p<0.001), serum albumin levels (p=0.033), high Child-Pugh score (p<0.001). During the follow-up period, 26 patients died (12.8%), 15 developed portal hypertension-related bleeding (7.3%), 30 developed hepatic encephalopathy (14.7%), and 9 developed hepatorenal syndrome type-1 (4.4%). SIRS showed significant correlations both to death (p<0.001) and to portal hypertension-related complications (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The systemic inflammatory response syndrome occurs in patients with advanced cirrhosis and is associated with a bad prognosis.

Circadian pattern of acute variceal bleeding among cirrhotic Egyptian patients.

BACKGROUND: Liver cirrhosis is the most common cause of portal hypertension which may end in serious bleeding from gastro-esophageal varices. Recent studies have demonstrated a daily pattern of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis evidenced by one or two peaks throughout the day. AIM: The assessment of the circadian rhythm of acute variceal bleeding with the possible participation of circadian changes of the fibrinolytic parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 264 patients with liver cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in addition to 20 healthy subjects as a control group. A series of hemostatic tests and parameters including prothrombin (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (Fib), Factors II, V, VII, IX, X, XI, platelets counts and fibrinolytic parameters assessement were completed in 60 patients in addition to the control group. The fibrinolytic activity was assessed by estimation of plasminogen, tissue plasminogen activator antigen (tPA: Ag) and plasminogen activator inhibitor antigen (PAI-1: Ag) at hour 09:00 and hour 17:00. The hemostatic tests and liver function tests were assessed once at hour 09.00. RESULTS: We observed statistically significant two time peaks of upper gastrointestinal bleeding at hour 04:00 and hour 17:00 with a peak of the fibrinolytic parameter, tissue plasminogen activator antigen, with the night peak of bleeding. A significant correlation between the levels of fibrinolytic parameters and hemostatic factors as well as liver function tests were detected. CONCLUSION: There are two time peaks of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with a temporal association between the night peak and a relative hyperfibrinolytic state.